Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West by Golly Gosh Virginia...I was kidnapped
    Age
    57
    Posts
    954

    Default Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Since when did we get an AFRICOM? This guy was just trying to fit in with Obama, even goes as far as to blame his staff for a "crew rest" stop in Bermuda. Hell, he's a 4 star, can't he make his own decisions?

    http://www.military.com/daily-news/2...2887570&rank=1
    Richard
    Amateur Woodworker Extraordinaire

    “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes
    near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright
    force. When you give up that force, you are ruined.”― Patrick Henry

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Left Coast, CA
    Posts
    675

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    I remember GEN Ward when I was in the 25th, I remember him being a pretty decent Division commander. Such a shame.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    8,017

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Just because this is the tip of a very big waste/fraud/abuse iceberg doesn't mean they shouldn't fry him and go look for more.

    Stick a fork in this General. He's done.

    BTW, I wonder who he pissed off?


    المتخلف اللص

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Waterbury CT
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,059

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Them stars got to his head it seems, and Mrs General thought she was Michelle

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Age
    70
    Posts
    811

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    "Since then, he has been working in Northern Virginia, serving as a special assistant to the vice chief of the Army."

    That sounds about as important as The U.S. Africa Command. Why does the Army need a chief of vice? What do they do, round up hookers for dignitaries?

    The whole thing sounds like more bullshit than anything else.

    -John



    Four boxes keep us free: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.


    - JoBa (101st Airborne, Co. C, 1st ABG, 502nd Inf, 1960-63)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,289

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Are those tats just above his collar?
    "Follow Me! Let's Go! All the Way! Airborne!!"
    MOΛΩN ΛABE!


    82d AG Co., '82-'83
    B Co., 1(A)/325th Inf Rgt, '83-'85

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Behind the Iron Curtain
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,180

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Don't know why anyone is surprised or that anything is being done to him. He is doing nothing different than any other 4 star general in the history of 4 star generals. Can you imagine Patton and MacAurthur in todays world/Army?
    FAVORITE POSTS:

    "Dr. Phil is not a member of this site."

    - Recondo82 -

    "As far as religious beliefs go, my Labrador Retriever thinks I'm God; I hate to disappoint her."
    -Purple-

    "Besides...the fallen speak to me at night and they told me to help you with that rucksack. Let them take a knee around you and pull security while you rest once in a while. They're still patrolling."
    -Kilted Heathen-

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    45
    Posts
    10,977

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Quote Originally Posted by JoBa View Post
    "Since then, he has been working in Northern Virginia, serving as a special assistant to the vice chief of the Army."

    That sounds about as important as The U.S. Africa Command. Why does the Army need a chief of vice? What do they do, round up hookers for dignitaries?

    The whole thing sounds like more bullshit than anything else.

    -John
    That's actually a position that's used for general officers who are "in holding". Usually either between assignments or, as in this case, in a world of hurt and waiting for the hammer to drop. Kinda like being on permanent CQ for us lowly enlisted types...
    11B2P
    B Company, 1/508 Inf (Abn) and 3/505 PIR
    Member of the original 505th PIR Gavin Squad - 1986



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NorCal
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,038

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    Everybody knows generals all have aides...

    Purple

    "Don't let yourself get treed by a Chihuahua."

    "SF doesn't do harassment. No encouragement; no discouragement. You cannot be in SF if you do not set your own standards. Nobody sets it for you. They just watch what you do. If you rest when you should be working, if you drink when you should be humping, if you let your buddy carry a load too heavy for him - you're gone. No questions, just you're gone. They don't need you."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    295

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    We (Enlisted) soldiers, should only wish we could have such a light punishment/outcome:

    http://www.stripes.com/news/general-...nding-1.196968

    General demoted for lavish travel, spending


    WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has demoted the former head of U.S. Africa Command who was accused of spending thousands of dollars on lavish travel and other unauthorized expenses, a senior U.S. official said Tuesday.


    Panetta stripped Gen. William "Kip" Ward of a star, which means that he will now retire as a three-star lieutenant general despite arguments from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff against the demotion. Ward also has been ordered to repay the government $82,000.


    The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the person wasn't authorized to discuss a personnel matter.


    The demotion comes as retired Army Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director because of an extramarital affair and Marine Gen. John Allen is being investigated for improper communications with a woman.


    According to the official, Panetta reviewed the Ward matter and concluded that the wrongdoing found by the Defense Department Inspector General, in a report released earlier this year, demanded accountability.


    In a statement issued Tuesday, a spokesman for Ward said the general "has never been motivated by personal gain and fulfilled each and every mission assigned to him and served his country and the men and women assigned to his commands with distinction."


    The spokesman, Chris Garrett, added that, "While General Ward is not perfect he has always been guided by his faith in God and the belief that there is no greater honor as a patriot than to lead those who choose to serve our nation in the armed forces."


    Retiring as a three-star will cost Ward about $30,000 a year in retirement pay — giving him close to $208,802 a year rather than the $236,650 he would get as a four-star.




    Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, urged Panetta to allow Ward, the former head of U.S. Africa Command, to retire at his full four-star general rank, according to defense officials. Other military leaders had noted that the demotion would cost Ward a lot of money.


    The inspector general's report found that Ward used military vehicles to shuttle his wife on shopping trips and to a spa and billed the government for a refueling stop overnight in Bermuda, where the couple stayed in a $750 suite. The report detailed lengthy stays at lavish hotels for Ward, his wife and his staff members, and the use of five-vehicle motorcades when he traveled to Washington.


    It also said Ward and his wife, Joyce, accepted dinner and Broadway show tickets from a government contractor during a trip during which he went backstage to meet actor Denzel Washington. The couple and several staff members also spent two nights at the Waldorf Astoria hotel.


    Other charges were that Ward often extended his overseas trips — particularly those to the U.S. — for personal reasons, resulting in "exponential" increases in costs.


    Although the report included responses from Ward to a number of the allegations, investigators often found records and statements that contradicted his explanations. At one point, Ward defended the Bermuda layover, saying that it came up on short notice, which is why his security team had to stay there longer. The report found records showing that the layover had been planned for at least four days in advance.


    A common theme running through the report was Ward's insistence that his wife travel with him at government cost, even though it was often not authorized and she performed few official duties. It said he also routinely stayed in high-priced suites in luxury hotels rather than in standard rooms or less expensive locales.


    The allegations, coming after a 17-month investigation, have delayed Ward's planned April 2011 retirement. And they were an embarrassing end note to his career, since he had claimed a place in history as the military's first commander of Africa Command.


    Panetta's options regarding Ward were limited by complex laws and military guidelines. He had only one real choice: allow Ward to retire as a four-star or demote him and force him to retire as a three-star lieutenant general.


    In order for Ward to be demoted to two-star rank, investigators would have to conclude that he also had problems before moving to Africa Command, and officials said that does not appear to be the case.


    The investigation dragged on for so long that that Ward was temporarily dropped to two-star general status. Under military guidelines, if a full general is not serving in a four-star command or office for more than 60 days, he or she is automatically reduced to two-star rank. Ward would not be able to recoup any back pay for the time at the two-star rank, even though he is being retired at the three-star level.


    Major general, or two-star, is the highest rank to which an officer can be promoted by regular military action. Becoming a three-star — lieutenant general — or a four-star general requires a presidential nomination and confirmation by Congress. It, therefore, is not considered permanent and lasts only as long as the person is serving in a job of that rank.


    That technical demotion is not uncommon as generals move from job to job and unexpected delays occur. It would not have affected Ward's ability to retire as a four-star, if he had been cleared of the charges.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    S. America
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: Report Accuses General of Lavish Expenses

    He stopped in Bermuda for more than a Rest Stop. He has been "Very Close" to a US Ambassador who was in Africa and is now in the Caribbean. LOL! Not sure if he stopped there this time for that but they used to have hookups in Europe!!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •