Pakistan retaliation puts NATO in lurch, saying alleged NATO attack kills 24 soldiers

[z0phi3l]

I don't think it has anything to do with who's in the WH. That will be our policy regardless. Look how BushII sidled up to Musharef and then the guy that replaced him. We ain't going anywhere.

I don't know, if this incident had happened under Bush, we wouldn't be looking for an excuse to apologize like Obama will as soon as he dares, Bush would have toed the line and told em to deal with it, they fired first, shit happens.

[Jeff82]

I don't know, if this incident had happened under Bush, we wouldn't be looking for an excuse to apologize like Obama will as soon as he dares, Bush would have toed the line and told em to deal with it, they fired first, shit happens.

I agree, but we wouldn't have cut any money or reduced our involvement in Pakyhakystan. We've too much to lose if they lose control of their nukes.

[Sgt.Raven]

We should buy one of the x-Soviets' "-stans" with all their corrupted guts for pennies on a dollar, set up huge B-52 and "Stealth" base, pacify Russia's President-to-be (the "shadow President" at the moment) by joint pressure on China, and start flying nukes all over Medieval East.
And if one will happen to "fall off" somewhere over the F*ckistan: oh well...

156060.jpg

[Jeff82]

We should buy one of the x-Soviets' "-stans" with all their corrupted guts for pennies on a dollar, set up huge B-52 and "Stealth" base, pacify Russia's President-to-be (the "shadow President" at the moment) by joint pressure on China, and start flying nukes all over Medieval East.
And if one will happen to "fall off" somewhere over the F*ckistan: oh well...
-snip-

I like it. Sgt.Raven for SecDef!!

[IEDmagnet]

**Update**

ISLAMABAD – Pakistan's army on Monday formally rejected a U.S. claim that American airstrikes that killed 24 Pakistani troops last year were justified as self-defense, a stance that could complicate efforts to repair the troubled but vital relationship between the two countries.
In a detailed report, the army said that Pakistani troops did not trigger the Nov. 26 incident at two posts along the Afghan border by firing at American and Afghan forces, as the U.S. has alleged. Pakistan's army said its troops shot at suspected militants who were nowhere near coalition troops.

LINK: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01...#ixzz1kqwGZQ3g

[RH]

Pakistan has always been a "double spy" for the U.S.

Because of their nuclear capabilities. The U.S. has always
treated them with rubber gloves.

The fact they have been giving "Terrorist Factions" a safe haven,
and always gets pissy if we retaliate against those factions. Should
prove that the only things they want from the U.S. is money, and aid.
Which they turn around and use against our own troops.

I say Fuck them and all the rest of them sumnabitchin
middle eastern countries like em.
Withdraw all our money, and aid. Let them know if they
fuckin twitch. We'll beat their asses like they have never
been beaten before.

We should change our ROE's and get mid-evil with these fuckers.
Gloves off. There is no such a thing as a fair fight. Let's see
who wants to listen, and play nice then!

Oh wait a minute...what was I thinking.

We should thank them, apologize, and reward them for all they
have done to help kill our warriors.

[IEDmagnet]

I've been all for a scorched earth policy from the get go. You want people to leave us the fuck alone? Let loose the War machine and let them work. See how many fucks harbor Terrorists and pick a fight with us from then on.